As the world grapples with climate change, businesses face increased pressure to reduce their environmental footprint. Achieving net zero emissions, where emissions are first reduced to the largest extent possible and the remaining unabatable emissions balanced by carbon removal solutions, has become a critical goal for many organisations. Companies are exploring various strategies to reach this target, with carbon offsetting and insetting emerging as two prominent approaches.
While both share the goal of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, they differ significantly in their methods and impacts. Understanding the nuances of carbon offsetting and insetting can empower businesses to make informed decisions for their sustainability journeys and ultimately contribute to a greener future.
What is Carbon Offsetting?
Balancing the Scale.
Carbon offsetting involves compensating for a company’s unavoidable emissions by investing in projects that reduce or remove carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere. These projects can be located anywhere in the world and span various types, including renewable energy projects, reforestation and enhanced rock weathering.
How Does Carbon Offsetting Work?
When a company offsets its carbon emissions, it purchases carbon credits from certified projects. Each carbon credit typically represents one metric tonne of CO₂e (carbon dioxide equivalent) that has been reduced or removed from the atmosphere. In simple terms, a company producing 1,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually could buy 1,000 carbon credits to offset its emissions, effectively making its net emissions zero. However, it’s imperative that high-permanence carbon credits are used to compensate for residual emissions that cannot be eliminated. Prioritising CO₂ reduction should be the first step in any effective carbon strategy.
Examples of Carbon Offsetting Projects
Renewable Energy Projects: These projects promote the transition away from fossil fuels by investing in clean energy sources like solar, wind or hydroelectric power. This reduces overall carbon emissions by generating electricity without greenhouse gases.
Reforestation and Afforestation: Planting trees serves a dual purpose: absorbing CO₂ as they grow and acting as long-term carbon sinks by storing the captured carbon within their biomass. Forests play a vital role in mitigating climate change by removing CO₂ from the atmosphere.
Enhanced Rock Weathering: This innovative approach accelerates the natural process where minerals react with atmospheric CO₂ and permanently lock it away in oceans as dissolved carbonate.
Learn more about the diverse range of carbon removal project types here.
Benefits and Challenges of Carbon Offsetting
Benefits: Offsetting offers immediate impact, allowing companies to compensate for their current emissions while establishing longer-term reduction strategies. It provides flexibility in choosing projects that align with specific goals and the ability to scale contributions up or down based on needs. Additionally, companies can support environmental projects worldwide, promoting positive change beyond their immediate operations.
Challenges: Potential pitfalls exist in offsetting. Double counting, one such risk, occurs if both the buyer and the project developer claim the same emissions reduction. Another risk is that critics argue that offsetting might create a perception of a “pollute now, fix later” approach, discouraging companies from prioritising internal emission reduction efforts. Also, the effectiveness of offset projects can vary significantly, highlighting the importance of thorough due diligence to ensure projects deliver credible and verifiable carbon reductions.
Ensuring Quality Carbon Offsets
To maximise the benefits and minimise the drawbacks of carbon offsetting, companies should prioritise high-quality projects. To qualify as such, these projects should adhere to three core principles:
Additionality: The project would not have happened without the investment from the carbon credits, ensuring the emission reductions are truly additional.
Permanence: The captured carbon is stored permanently or for a very long time, minimising the risk of reversal.
Verifiability: The emission reductions can be accurately measured and independently confirmed through credible certification schemes. Established standards like the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and the Gold Standard offer valuable guidance in identifying reliable offset projects.
What is Carbon Insetting?
Taking Ownership Within the Value Chain.
Carbon insetting involves reducing emissions within a company’s value chain. Rather than depending on external projects, businesses invest in initiatives that directly impact their operations, promoting a more comprehensive approach to sustainability.
How Does Carbon Insetting Work?
Insetting projects become integrated components of a company’s value chain, addressing emissions at their source. Consider a food and beverage company collaborating with its farmers to implement regenerative agriculture practices. These practices not only reduce emissions through improved soil health and carbon sequestration but also enhance biodiversity and farm resilience.
Examples of Carbon Insetting Projects
Regenerative Agriculture: This approach utilises practices like cover cropping, no-till farming and agroforestry. These methods promote soil health, leading to increased carbon storage and reduced emissions compared to conventional farming techniques.
Energy Efficiency Improvements: Upgrading equipment and optimising production processes within manufacturing facilities can significantly reduce energy consumption and associated emissions. Modernising machinery, improving insulation and implementing automation technologies are examples of such initiatives.
Sustainable Land Use: Companies can invest in reforestation or afforestation projects on land they own or manage. These efforts not only absorb CO₂ but also contribute to habitat restoration, improved water cycles and enhanced ecosystem services within the local environment.
Benefits and Challenges of Carbon Insetting
Benefits: Insetting offers several advantages. Companies have complete control and ownership over their projects, ensuring alignment with their sustainability goals. This approach fosters stronger relationships with suppliers and local communities, contributing to positive social and economic development. Additionally, by addressing emissions at the source within the value chain, companies build more resilient and sustainable operations in the long term.
Challenges: Despite its benefits, insetting presents challenges. Developing and implementing insetting projects often requires significant planning, resources and time investment. The scope of insetting can be limited by the boundaries of a company’s value chain, potentially restricting the range of feasible projects. Verifying the effectiveness of insetting projects can be complex and costly, requiring robust measurement and verification systems.
Best Practices for Successful Insetting
Companies can maximise the impact of their insetting initiatives by adhering to best practices:
Conduct a Detailed Supply Chain Analysis: A comprehensive understanding of where emissions occur within the supply chain is crucial for identifying the most impactful insetting opportunities. This analysis helps companies prioritise areas for intervention and target their efforts strategically.
Engage Stakeholders Proactively: Collaboration is key. Working closely with suppliers, local communities and other relevant stakeholders fosters project buy-in, ensures long-term sustainability, and leverages diverse expertise for successful implementation.
Set Clear Objectives and Metrics: Defining success is essential. Establishing clear objectives and measurable metrics allows companies to track progress, evaluate the effectiveness of their insetting projects and demonstrate the environmental and social benefits achieved.
Deliver Co-Benefits: Designing insetting projects that generate additional positive outcomes beyond carbon reduction is highly beneficial. These co-benefits can include improved biodiversity within ecosystems, enhanced livelihoods for local communities and strengthened supply chain stability.
Carbon Offsetting vs Carbon Insetting: A Strategic Union, Not a Choice
The most effective sustainability strategy often involves utilising both offsetting and insetting methods in a complementary manner.
Immediate Action with Offsetting: Offsetting provides a practical solution for achieving immediate emission reductions. Companies can leverage carbon credits to compensate for their current emissions while they develop and implement longer-term insetting projects within their value chain.
Long-Term Sustainability with Insetting: Insetting projects address emissions within the value chain, leading to more sustainable and resilient operations. These projects can deliver co-benefits like improved community development and supply chain stability, fostering a more holistic approach to sustainability.
Recommendations for Businesses: A Roadmap to Net Zero
Businesses can navigate the path to net zero by following these key recommendations:
Assess Your Carbon Footprint: A thorough understanding of your emissions across all scopes (1, 2 and 3) is the foundation for any successful carbon strategy. This assessment identifies areas where both offsetting and insetting can be most effective.
Set Clear Goals: Define your short-term and long-term sustainability targets. Utilise offsetting to achieve immediate emission reduction goals while establishing a long-term vision for insetting to drive sustainable transformation within your value chain.
Invest in High-Quality Projects: Whether offsetting or insetting, ensure the projects you support meet high standards for additionality, permanence and verification. This maximises the environmental impact of your investments and contributes to credible carbon reduction efforts.
Engage Stakeholders: Collaboration is paramount. Work closely with suppliers, customers, and local communities to ensure successful insetting projects that deliver meaningful benefits beyond carbon reduction. This fosters transparency, builds trust and leverages collective expertise for a more sustainable future.
From Footprint to Impact
Understanding the difference between carbon offsetting and insetting is crucial for businesses aiming to achieve net zero emissions. While offsetting provides an immediate solution to compensate for emissions, insetting integrates sustainability within the company’s value chain, offering long-term benefits and resilience.
By strategically combining both approaches, businesses can not only reduce their carbon footprint but also contribute to broader environmental and social goals. This holistic approach ensures that companies meet their climate commitments while supporting sustainable development.
![](https://un-do.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2_Enhanced-Weathering_Our-Technology.jpg)
Take Action Towards Net Zero
At UNDO, we believe in the power of both carbon offsetting and insetting to achieve net zero emissions. Join us in making informed, impactful decisions for a sustainable future.